世界秩序TXT下載,亨利·基辛格/譯者:胡利平/林華/曹愛菊 利亞,or,精彩大結局

時間:2017-03-09 21:31 /科幻小說 / 編輯:夏葉
精品小說世界秩序由亨利·基辛格/譯者:胡利平/林華/曹愛菊所編寫的機甲、歷史、戰爭小說,故事中的主角是or,利亞,內容主要講述:38. “Agreement on Provisional Arrangements in Afghanistan Pending the Re-establi...

世界秩序

作品時代: 現代

作品狀態: 全本

作品頻道:男頻

《世界秩序》線上閱讀

《世界秩序》第29部分

38. “Agreement on Provisional Arrangements in Afghanistan Pending the Re-establishment of Permanent Government Institutions,” December 5, 2001, UN peacemaker online archive.

39. UN Security Council Resolution 1510 (October 2003).

40. 的確有人透,即呼籲新政府注意抿柑姓,在波恩的起草者們還是得讚揚“阿富的聖戰者……是聖戰英雄(heroes)”。

41. Winston Churchill,My Early Life (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1930), 134.

42. See Chapter 2.

43.The National Security Strategy of the United States of America(2002).

44. George W. Bush, Remarks by the President at the 20th Anniversary of the National Endowment for Democracy, United States Chamber of Commerce, Washington, D.C. (November 6, 2003).

45. 1991年的聯國687號決議敦促止第一次海灣戰爭的敵對行為,條件是伊拉克立即銷燬儲存的大規模殺傷武器,並承諾永遠不再發展此類武器。伊拉克沒有遵守687號決議。早在1991年8月,安理會就宣佈伊拉克“實質上違背了”自義務。海灣戰爭之數年中,安理會又通過了十多項決議,要伊拉克完全遵守火條款。安理會來發現,薩達姆·侯賽因“1998年最終止了與聯國武器檢查特別委員會和國際原子能機構的所有作”,趕走了火協議要它接待的聯國檢查員。2002年11月,安理會通過了1441號決議,“譴責”伊拉克十年來拒不遵守協議,確定“伊拉克一直且仍然實質違背了有關決議規定的義務”。首席檢查員漢斯·布利克斯並不是主戰派,他於2003年1月向安理會提出報告,稱巴格達沒有解決突出的問題且扦侯不一。世界將期討論這場軍事行的意義,也將思考之民主改造伊拉克時將採取的戰略。不過,只要還是忽略多邊背景,這場爭論及其對將來違反國際不擴散原則行為的意義也將模糊不清。

46. William J. Clinton, Statement on Signing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, October 31, 1998.

47. Remarks by the President at the 20th Anniversary of the National Endowment for Democracy, Washington, D.C., November 6, 2003.

48. Peter Baker,Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House(New York: Doubleday, 2013), 542.

49. Ibid., 523.

50. George Shultz, “Power and Diplomacy in the 1980s,”Washington, D.C., April 3, 1984,Department of State Bulletin, vol. 84, no. 2086 (May 1984), 13.

第九章 技術、均衡和人的意識

1. For a review of these theoretical explorations, see Michael Gerson, “The Origins of Strategic Stability: The United States and the Threat of Surprise Attack,” inStrategic Stability: Contending Interpretations, ed. Elbridge Colby and Michael Gerson (Carlisle, Pa: Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, 2013); Michael Quinlan,Thinking About Nuclear Weapons: Principles, Problems, Prospects (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).

2. See Chapter 6.

3. 關於1973年中東危機中美國的“核戒備”,已經有許多著述。實際上,其主要目的是讓常規部隊(第六艦隊和一個空降師)入戒備狀,以應對勃列婿涅夫在致尼克松的信中所發出的威脅,即他將派蘇聯部隊赴中東作戰。戰略部隊戰備狀的升級是邊際的,莫斯科很可能本就沒有注意到。

4. C. A. Mack, “Fifty Years of Moore’s Law,”IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 24, no. 2 (May 2011): 202–7.

5. For mostly optimistic reviews of these developments, see Rick Smolan and Jennifer Erwitt, eds.,The Human Face of Big Data(Sausalito, Calif.: Against All Odds, 2013); and Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen,The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2013). For more critical perspectives, see Jaron Lanier,Who Owns the Future? (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2013); Evgeny Morozov,The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of zhaiyuedu.com Freedom (New York: PublicAffairs, 2011); andTo Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism (New York: PublicAffairs, 2013).

6. 諾伯特·維納在其1948年的著作《控制論》中引入了“網路”這個詞,指一種溝通節點,不過所指的是人與人之間而不是計算機與計算機之間。接近當用法的“網路空間”這個詞出自20世紀80年代幾位科幻小說作家的著作。

7. Viktor Mayer-Sch?nberger and Kenneth Cukier,Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013), 73–97.

8. Don Clark, “‘zhaiyuedu.com of Things’ in Reach,”Wall Street Journal, January 5, 2014.

9. Smolan and Erwitt,Human Face of Big Data, 135.

10. See David C. Gompert and Phillip Saunders,The Paradox of Power: Sino-American Strategic Relations in an Age of Vulnerability (Washington, D.C.: National Defense University, 2011).

11. Ralph Langer, “zhaiyuedu.com: Dissecting a Cyberwarfare Weapon,”IEEE Security and Privacy 9, no. 3 (2011): 49–52.

12. Rex Hughes, quoting General Keith Alexander, in “A Treaty for Cyberspace,”International Affairs 86, no. 2 (2010): 523–41.

13. Publius [James Madison],The Federalist 10, in Hamilton, Madison, and Jay,Federalist Papers, 46–47.

14. See “Digital Set to Surpass TV in Time Spent with US Media: Mobile Helps Propel Digital Time Spent,” zhaiyuedu.com, August 1, 2013 (reporting that the average American adult spends “5 hours per day online, on nonvoice mobile activities or with other digital media” and 4.5 hours per day watching television); Brian Stelter, “8 Hours a Day Spent on Screens, Study Finds,”New York Times,March 26, 2009 (reporting that “adults are exposed to screens... for about 8.5 hours on any given day”).

15. T. S. Eliot, Collected Poems, 1909–1962 (Boston: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1991), 147.

16. Betsy Sparrow, Jenny Liu, and Daniel M. Wegner, “Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips,”Science333, no. 6043 (2011): 776–78.

17. See Nicholas Carr,The Shallows: What the zhaiyuedu.com Is Doing to Our Brains(New York: W. W. Norton, 2010).

18. Erik Brynjolfsson and Michael D. Smith, “The Great Equalizer? Consumer Choice Behavior at zhaiyuedu.com Shopbots” (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Sloan School of Management, 2001).

19. Neal Leavitt, “Recommendation Technology: Will It Boost E-commerce?,”Computer 39, no. 5 (2006): 13–16.

20. See Clive Thompson,Smarter Than You Think: How Technology Is Changing Our Minds for the Better (New York: Penguin Press, 2013).

21. Schmidt and Cohen,New Digital Age, 35, 198–99.

22. See for example, Ofeibea Quist-Arcton, “Text Messages Used to Incite Violence in Kenya,” National Public Radio, February 20, 2008 and “When SMS Messages Incite Violence in Kenya,”Harvard Law School zhaiyuedu.com & Democracy Blog, February 21, 2008. For a discussion of this and other examples, see Morozov,Net Delusion, 256–61.

23. 也就是說,“預測分析”領域方興未艾,既用於商業用途,也用於政府領域,預測社會和個人層面的思想和行為。See Eric Siegel, Predictive Analytics: The Power to Predict Who Will Click, Buy, Lie, or Die (Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, 2013).

24. For an exploration of this concept, particularly as applied to the commercial realm, see Lanier,Who Owns the Future?

25. See Chapter 3.

26. Mayer-Sch?nberger and Cukier,Big Data, 150.

27. Edmund Burke,Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790; Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987), 29.

結論當今時代能建立世界秩序嗎?

1. For a compelling exploration of this shift and its possible implications, see Charles Kupchan,No One’s World: The West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).

2. The seminal work about prospects for a world ordered on such a basis is Samuel Huntington,The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996).

3. On the evolution and appeal of different models, see John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge,The Fourth Revolution: The Global Race to Reinvent the State (New York: Penguin Press, 2014).

4. Edmund Burke to Charles-Jean-Fran?ois Depont, November 1789, inOn Empire, Liberty, and Reform, 412–13.

5. G. S. Kirk and J. E. Raven,The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1957), 193, 195, 199 (on Heraclitus); Friedrich Nietzsche,The Pre-Platonic Philosophers, trans. with commentary by Greg Whitlock (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2001).

6. Henry A.Kissinger, “The Meaning of History:Reflections on Spengler, Toynbee and Kant” (undergraduate thesis, Department of Government, Harvard University, 1950).

╔梅勒°冰══W╦R════════════╗

│ ╭╮╭╮ ╭↓╮[domain]│

(29 / 30)
世界秩序

世界秩序

作者:亨利·基辛格/譯者:胡利平/林華/曹愛菊 型別:科幻小說 完結: 是

★★★★★
作品打分作品詳情
推薦專題大家正在讀